What Borders for Europe?, Fall 2004

Sunday, December 5, 2004

The author discusses two opposing visions within the Union regarding the borders of the European Union. The first vision makes the case based on a geographical and historical identity for Europe. The second vision, however, looks to the future. He is defending the latter by claiming that the definition of the EU’s borders can neither be based on historical nor geographic and even less on religious factors. As such, Turkey has a rightful place within Europe. Europe can only continue to be a major actor by rejecting a narrow vision which would limit it to its historical core. Furthermore, the author argues that enlargement and deepening are complementary. He sees the former as part of political deepening: to be able to influence the future of the international system one has to have a critical size...Please click here to read the text in full.

CONTRIBUTOR

Dominique Strauss-Kahn

TPQ SPONSORS

FROM THE DESK OF THE EDITOR

The last one year proved itself to be a very tough year, and it brought many new challenges for the international relations. Among these new challenges, the most striking one is probably the Russia’s unleashing a war of aggression on Ukraine. As Russia's invasion stepped up on the 24 February 2022, many Western experts and policymakers predicted that the Ukrainian armed forces...