Independent and cutting-edge analysis on global affairs

This essay defines the nature of state failure and explains the differences between strong, weak, failing, failed, and collapsed states. The author argues that failing states are a particular worry to the security of the twenty-first century. The role of the European Union and NATO in approaching the issue of failed states, and the deficiencies of EU and NATO policy are noted. Methods of preventing state failure are discussed, along with indicators that provide early warning for failure.Nation-states fail because they no longer deliver positive political goods to their people. Their governments lose legitimacy and, in the eyes and hearts of a growing plurality of its citizens, the nation-state itself becomes illegitimate.  These kinds of states – failed states and collapsed states (an extreme form) – are proliferating in number and posing larger and larger challenges to world order. They constitute security threats because of the disorder and non-state actors which they harbor. They threaten a region’s and the world’s security as they create potential reservoirs for terror movements and terrorists.

 

Please click here to read the text in full

CONTRIBUTOR
Robert I. Rotberg
Robert I. Rotberg
The Premium Corporate Sponsor of TPQ
Yapı Kredi
Foreword TPQ’s Summer issue, NATO in 2020 and Beyond: New Strategies and Frontiers, offers insights on the Alliance’s current challenges and future security trends, while offering a look into Euro-Atlantic relations in the coming decade. It is clear that as the international security landscape is rapidly changing, member states’ capabilities, resilience, and most importantly, their...
STAY CONNECTED
SIGN UP FOR NEWSLETTER
FACEBOOK
PARTNERS